The GI Joe cartoon I watched as a kid always ended with the phrase “And knowing is half the battle . . .”  When I first began practicing law in 2006, I figured that after a few years (maybe 5 or 6), I would know enough to get by.  I “get by” just fine, but I am astounded how much I still learn every week.

This communication aims to inform its recipients, as well as its writer, of some law or procedure I’ve recently learned, and how much is still out there for me to wrap my head around.

If “knowing is half the battle” as the show said, I figure after almost 9 years, I’m about 25% of the way to half-way there.

I filed a Motion to Quash this week based on the District Attorney’s failure to prosecute the case within the appropriate time limits.

The charge stemmed from a 2003 incident, and the Bill of Information formally charging the client was not filed until 2014.

Because the subject charge was a felony, but it was a type of felony punishable “with or without hard labor,” the DA had only 4 years to institute prosecution.  As such, the bill was not timely filed:

Art. 572.  Limitation of prosecution of noncapital offenses
A.  Except as provided in Articles 571 and 571.1, no person shall be prosecuted, tried, or punished for an offense not punishable by death or life imprisonment, unless the prosecution is instituted within the following periods of time after the offense has been committed:
(1)  Six years, for a felony necessarily punishable by imprisonment at hard labor.
(2)  Four years, for a felony not necessarily punishable by imprisonment at hard labor.
(3)  Two years, for a misdemeanor punishable by a fine, or imprisonment, or both.
(4)  Six months, for a misdemeanor punishable only by a fine or forfeiture.
B.(1)  Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 571.1 and Paragraph A of this Article, prosecutions for any sex offense may be commenced beyond the time limitations set forth in this Title if the identity of the offender is established after the expiration of such time limitation through the use of a DNA profile.
(2)  A prosecution under the exception provided by this Paragraph shall be commenced within three years from the date on which the identity of the suspect is established by DNA testing.
(3)  For purposes of this Article, “DNA” means deoxyribonucleic acid, which is located in cells and provides an individual’s personal genetic blue print and which encodes genetic information that is the basis of human heredity and forensic identification.
(4)  This Paragraph shall have retroactive application to crimes committed prior to June 20, 2003.
C.  Upon expiration of the time period in which a prosecution may be instituted, any bail bond applicable to that prosecution which bond has not been forfeited shall also expire, and all obligations of that bail undertaking shall be extinguished as a matter of law.
Amended by Acts 1984, No. 926, §1; Acts 2001, No. 207, §1; Acts 2003, No. 487, §2, eff. June 20, 2003; Acts 2003, No. 809, §1, eff. July 1, 2003; Acts 2006, No. 123, §1, eff. June 2, 2006.

NOTE: See Acts 2003, No. 487, §5, relative to application.

As with every rule, there are exceptions, notably:

Art. 575.  Interruption of time limitations
The periods of limitation established by this Chapter shall be interrupted when the defendant:
(1)  For the purpose of avoiding detection, apprehension or prosecution, flees from the state, is outside the state, or is absent from his usual place of abode within the state; or
(2)  Lacks mental capacity to proceed at trial and is committed in accordance with Article 648 of this Code.
Amended by Acts 1979, No. 318, §1.